Declining Birth Rate and Increasing Population Worldwide Increases Demand for Various Human Reproductive Technologies
Decline birth rate worldwide has led to increasing adoption
of various the human reproductive technologies. For instance, according to the
World Bank, Japan’s birth rate, crude (per 1,000 people) decreased from 8.413
in 2005 to 7.4 in 2018. On the other hand, increasing population has also led
to approval and launch of contraception products. In May 2020, Evofem
Biosciences, Inc. received the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval
for Phexxi (lactic acid, citric acid and potassium bitartrate) vaginal gel used
to prevent pregnancy in females of reproductive potential for use as an
on-demand method of contraception.
As the use of the human
reproductive technologies advances, there is increasing concern about
ethical issues surrounding these medical interventions. While the use of
fertility medication has been approved by the FDA, there are still questions about
how to regulate it because of the fact that it is not a prescription and
because of the inherent risks associated with using the technology.
The first thing that we need to recognize is that the
technology of artificial insemination has been around for decades. The only
difference today is that we now have the ability to use the technology to
assist in the process of getting pregnant. The goal of fertility medication is
to help women who are having trouble getting pregnant to be able to conceive naturally.
However, the questions arise about whether or not the use of fertility
medication should always be relegated to those who are having reproductive
issues that are not being caused by medical conditions.
One of the biggest debates is between those who support the
use of in vitro fertilization and those who are against it concerning the
ethics of the procedure. The pro-in vitro fertilization camp states that the
procedure is entirely ethical because there are no living people that are being
fertilized in the procedure. The main concern comes from the fact that there is
no way to know what type of embryo would end up being used in the procedure.
Some argue that there are still problems with the use of in vitro fertilization
(AIF) despite the fact that there have been several guidelines set forth by the
FDA.
There have also been questions surrounding the use of the
procedure in certain circumstances. For instance, if a woman's chances of
becoming pregnant with a boy are greater than her chances of becoming pregnant
with a girl, then artificial insemination with a boy may be considered a viable
option. This is known as gender selection. Additionally, some groups have
argued that artificial insemination with sperm from the male partner will
create a stronger future sperm for the female. However, it is also important to
note that there is a strong genetic component when it comes to determining the
gender of an infant.
Another issue that is frequently brought up regarding the
use of in vitro fertilization is the fact that there is no way to guarantee the
successful pregnancy that occurs after the procedure. There have been reports
over the years where in vitro fertilization performed on healthy donors has
resulted in live births. Still, it is possible for the pregnancy to fail either
through the failure to implant the embryo or due to some damage done to the
eggs or uterus. In these cases, in vitro fertilization could be considered as a
waste of time. This is especially true in the case of those who have already been
able to achieve pregnancy using other fertility treatments.
As more couples turn to fertility treatments that use in
vitro fertilization, there will continue to be improvements made in the field.
The time needed for in vitro fertilization to work is now only a matter of days
rather than months or years. The costs of the procedure have become much more
affordable in recent years as well. It is likely that these trends will
continue as more couples turn to new and innovative methods to get pregnant.
Comments
Post a Comment